Finding · as stated by the study, recorded by Coridum · status verified-machine

Finding F-0109

“The optical particle counter, influenced by particle light-scattering properties and density differences, underestimated the mass concentration of particles larger than 0.3 μm, capturing only 46.9% of the benchmark value.”

Wang et al. Cooking Fume Particulate Matter as an Indoor Air Pollution Source: Comparative Measurement Methods and Correction Factors (2026). Page 1. CKB 1077

Structure

Source
Cooking
Factor
Particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀)
Method
Optical particle counter
Setting
laboratory, CN
Study design
laboratory measurement-method comparison: cooking fumes generated under simulated typical cooking conditions, manual gravimetric analysis as benchmark against an optical particle counter (Promo 3000), a photometer (DustTrak 8533) and infrared spectrophotometry (class 4)
Effect
ratio 46.9
Caveat
underestimation attributed by the authors to light-scattering properties and density differences of cooking-fume particles

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.