Finding · as stated by the study, recorded by Coridum · status verified-machine
Finding F-0237
“However, no significant improvements were observed for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: −0.07 to 0.15), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC), respiratory symptoms, or blood pressure.”
Structure
- Factor
- Particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀)
- Outcome
- Lung function
- Intervention
- Air filtration and air purifiers
- Study design
- systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 randomised controlled trials of personal-level protective measures against air pollution (air purifiers, respirators and similar), GRADE-assessed (class 2)
- Effect
- SMD 0.04 (-0.07–0.15)
- Sample
- 27 studies
- Flags
- ci-includes-1
- Caveat
- the same sentence reports no significant improvement in peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity, respiratory symptoms or blood pressure (no numbers given for those)
A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.