Finding F-0274

“The average estimated PM10, PM2.5, PM1, and PM0.1 resuspension rates were (2.5 ± 0.6) × 10−1 h−1, (1.9 ± 0.5) × 10−2 h−1, (6.5 ± 0.3) × 10−3 h−1, and (4.3 ± 0.3) × 10−3 h−1, respectively.”

Benabed PM10, PM2.5, PM1, and PM0.1 resuspension due to human walking (2022). Air quality, atmosphere, & health. Page 1. CKB 8546

Structure

Factor: Particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀)
Setting: test chamber, FR
Study design: full-scale laboratory chamber experiment: tufted synthetic carpet loaded with neutralised alumina dust, PM measured with a Grimm Miniwras counter during 10 min of human walking, resuspension rates estimated from a mass balance under the well-mixed assumption (class 4)
Effect: other 0.0065
Caveat: resuspension by walking on a dust-loaded carpet in a chamber; walking as a source has no Vocabulary slug; the spread is printed as ± without naming the measure

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.