Finding F-0536

“With each additional dampness indicator, odds of psychological distress increased by 4% (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P < .01).”

Damp housing conditions as a determinant of psychological distress: a longitudinal analysis of the British Household Panel Survey (2026). American journal of epidemiology. Page 1. CKB 6448

Structure

Source: Dampness and water damage
Outcome: Psychological stress
Population: adult household members
Setting: dwelling, GB
Study design: longitudinal analysis of the British Household Panel Survey 1996-2008 (n = 9189 at baseline): self-reported dampness indicators (condensation, leaky roof, rot, damp walls/floors) and their count against psychological distress from the General Health Questionnaire, multivariate fixed-effects logistic regression (class 3)
Effect: OR 1.04 (1.02–1.07) per 1 dampness indicator
Sample: 9189 participants
Caveat: psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire caseness) filed under psychological-stress

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.