Finding F-0807

“The kerosene using homes (n = 5) had higher 24 h mean CO compared to the 42 non-kerosene homes (geometric mean 3.3 (3.1) ppm vs. 0.6 (1.9) ppm, respectively), as did the mosquito repellent homes (n = 4) vs. the non-mosquito repellent homes (n = 43) (geometric mean 2.5 (10.7) ppm vs. 0.7 (2.0) ppm, respectively).”

Kipter Indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide concentrations in homes of infants in Nairobi, Kenya (2026). PLOS Glob Public Health. Page 10. CKB 1569

Structure

Source: Kerosene
Factor: Carbon monoxide (CO)
Population: households with an infant
Setting: home, KE
Study design: cross-sectional measurement study in the homes of infants in Nairobi, Kenya: 24-hour indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and continuous carbon monoxide in 48 homes, with reported combustion sources and household characteristics from questionnaires (class 4)
Effect: median 3.3
Averaging time: 24 h
Sample: 5 homes
Caveat: geometric mean recorded under measure median, with the geometric standard deviation in dispersion; the register has no slug for mosquito repellent

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.