Finding · as stated by the study, recorded by Coridum · status verified-machine
Finding F-0875
“In exploratory analyses, PM2.5 and CO concentrations were not substantially different during electricity cooking periods compared to periods of no cooking, and kerosene cooking events were few, so we did not account for electricity or kerosene cooking in our models.”
Structure
- Source
- Biomass fuel
- Factor
- Carbon monoxide (CO)
- Population
- households in a dense low-income settlement
- Study design
- observational study in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh: ten clusters of an index home cooking with biomass and its neighbouring homes, with PM2.5 and carbon monoxide monitored at the stove, in the index home's sleeping space, in neighbouring homes with and without a shared wall and outdoors, during observed cooking events and over 24 hours (class 4)
- Caveat
- kerosene cooking events were too few to model, so only biomass was kept in the models
A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.