Finding F-0958

“Mean CO concentrations were reduced by 16% (Envirofit PCS-1), 42% (Greenway), 35% (BioLite), 55% (Philips), and 42% (Eco-Chulha) compared to the TCS.”

Muralidharan et al. Field testing of alternative cookstove performance in a rural setting of western India… (2015). International journal of environmental research and public health. Page 5. CKB 6962

Structure

Source: Biomass fuel
Factor: Carbon monoxide (CO)
Intervention: Improved cookstoves
Setting: kitchen, IN
Study design: field testing of five alternative cookstoves against the traditional cookstove in a real-world test kitchen in rural western India: PM2.5 and carbon monoxide measured over one-hour cooking tests, twelve trials per stove (class 3)
Effect: difference 16
Averaging time: 1 h test
Caveat: the reduction was statistically significant for every alternative stove except the Envirofit

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.