Finding · as stated by the study, recorded by Coridum · status verified-machine

Finding F-1605

“Regardless of the flow rate mode, the prototype mitigated more than 99% of viable airborne bacteria.”

Li et al. Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air (2022). International journal of environmental research and public health. Page 15. CKB 8876

Structure

Factor
Airborne bacteria
Intervention
Air filtration and air purifiers
Setting
test chamber
Study design
laboratory evaluation of an air cleaning device combining filtration and ultraviolet light: the removal of viable airborne bacteria measured for six treatment options at a high and a low flow rate (class 4)
Effect
other 99
Caveat
more than this share, at either flow rate, for the whole device; the study puts the filtration treatment alone at over 98% and the ultraviolet treatment at nearly 79% at the low dose and nearly 95% at the high dose

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.