Finding · as stated by the study, recorded by Coridum · status verified-machine
Finding F-1713
“Similarly, compared to alive birth status, the prevalence of stillbirth status was higher (PR = 2.40, 95% CI: 2.21, 2.62) for household exposed to unclean cooking fuel compared to those in households using clean cooking fuel.”
Structure
- Source
- Solid fuel
- Outcome
- Stillbirth
- Setting
- home
- Study design
- cross-sectional analysis of a national survey: households using unclean cooking fuel compared with households using clean fuel, with prevalence ratios for smoking, stillbirth and low birth weight (class 4)
- Effect
- other 2.40 (2.21–2.62)
- Caveat
- a prevalence ratio from a cross-sectional survey, so it compares households and not the course of a pregnancy; the study adds that households with low birth weight were 17% more likely to use unclean fuel
A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.