Finding F-1722

“For coal/charcoal, the adjusted PR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.31), and for other solid fuels it was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.17).”

Vera-Ponce et al. Biomass Cooking Fuel Use and Screen-Detected Hypertension Among Peruvian Women Without Known Hypertension: A National Cross-Sectional Study (2026). Life (Basel, Switzerland). Page 7. CKB 6541

Structure

Source: Solid fuel
Outcome: Hypertension
Setting: home
Study design: pooled analysis of national surveys: the household cooking fuel related to screen-detected hypertension, adjusted for education, wealth quintile and survey year, with a fuel-specific analysis (class 4)
Effect: other 0.92 (0.72–1.17)
Caveat: the study's residual category of other solid fuels; the same sentence puts coal and charcoal at 1.00 (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.31)

A Finding records what one published document states, verbatim and with its page. It is not a conclusion of Coridum; see the Claims that build on it.